27.7.09

Music Pirates - an Ancient Enemy

Many people think music pirates were created by a singularity during the late 90s... a terrible convergence of the Internet, affordable personal computers and advances in sport beverage technology.

Unfortunately, for so many innocent and deserving servants of the Muse, this is not so....





despite the best efforts of merchants, Church and State, there were always "music lovers" whose need for a musical 'fix' blinded them to the terrible price of their 'free' song....






ong before the personal computer and the Internet, code was a tool that pirates could use to great effect in eluding their rightful responsibilities...






This line of code was found in a tunnel behind a false wall in a latrine at a brothel in Marseille. The writer has promised the soul of their first-born child if the Fallen Angel can will fill every night and every day with 'free' music.






Here, in Lemonique's immortal Robbery of the Opening Act, the another Artist is laid low by a music pirate intent upon possessing her only copy of the words to her new song, oblivious to the distress of the Artist and the baby cow, seen behind the pirate.

Such scenes were all-too-common before the rise of modern performance rights organizations...




-30-



9.7.09

Well, you know that's just like... your opinion, man.





















"Retarded artistically. Idiotic in other respects."



Teacher's assessment of 12-year-old Keith Moon,
Alperton Secondary School, Wembley, 1958




-30-



16.6.09

Freedom—or Copyright?

a very succinct overview on core issues
at the GNU Project site....


by Richard M. Stallman

Copyright was established in the age of the printing press as an industrial regulation on the business of writing and publishing. The aim was to encourage the publication of a diversity of written works. The means was to require publishers to get the author's permission to publish recent writings. This enabled authors to get income from publishers, which facilitated and encouraged writing. The general reading public received the benefit of this, while losing little: copyright restricted only publication, not the things an ordinary reader could do. That made copyright arguably a beneficial system for the public, and therefore legitimate.

Well and good—back then.

More recently, humanity developed a new way of distributing information: computers and networks. They facilitated copying and manipulating information, including software, musical recordings, books, and movies, and offered the possibility of unlimited access to all sorts of data—an information utopia.

One obstacle stood in the way: copyright. Readers and listeners who made use of their new ability to copy and share published information were technically copyright infringers. The same law which had formerly acted as a beneficial industrial regulation on publishers had become a restriction on the public it was meant to serve.


read the rest @

http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/freedom-or-copyright.html

-30-



15.6.09

Public Policy Wiki - The Globe and Mail - The Dominion Institute : Bill C-61

Read all about it... the bill that Stephen "I'm not a prime minister, but I play one on TV" Harper is going to pass... and which it now appears the Liberals are going to roll over for too.

Bill C-61: An Act to amend the Copyright Act


Preamble:

Whereas the Copyright Act provides an essential framework for predictable and fair commerce, creativity and innovation;

Whereas information and communications technologies that link communities around the world present opportunities and challenges that are global in scope for the creation and use of copyright works or other subject-matter;

But don't read it and weep!

Go to the wiki of this act at the Globe and Mail
http://policywiki.theglobeandmail.com/tiki-index.php?page=Download+Decade


If you think this is wrong, you're not alone...
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=6315846683&ref=ts



RIAA sued under gang laws - CNET News

It's probably not the first time that record company executives have been likened to Al Capone, but this time a judge might have to agree or disagree.

A New Jersey woman, one of the hundreds of people accused of copyright infringement by the Recording Industry Association of America, has counter-sued the big record labels, charging them with extortion and violations of the federal anti-racketeering act.

Obama Sides With RIAA, Supports $150,000 Fine per Music Track | Threat Level | Wired.com



filed under "this is not good news"


Two top lawyers in President Barack Obama’s Justice Department are former RIAA lawyers: Donald Verrilli Jr. is the associate deputy attorney general who brought down Grokster and fought to prevent a retrial in the Jammie Thomas case. Then there’s the No. 2 in the DOJ, Tom Perrilli. As Verrilli’s former boss, Perrilli argued in 2002 that internet service providers should release customer information to the RIAA even without a court subpoena.


-30-

11.6.09

The Problem with Music by Steve Albini (2)

this segment gets down to the real nitty-gritty...


There's this band...







They're pretty ordinary, but they're also pretty good, so they've attracted some attention. They're signed to a moderate-sized "independent" label owned by a distribution company, and they have another two albums owed to the label.

They're a little ambitious. They'd like to get signed by a major label so they can have some security: you know, get some good equipment, tour in a proper tour bus -- nothing fancy, just a little reward for all the hard work.

To that end, they got a manager. He knows some of the label guys, and he can shop their next project to all the right people. He takes his cut, sure, but it's only 15%, and if he can get them signed then it's money well spent. Anyways, it doesn't cost them anything if it doesn't work. 15% of nothing isn't much!

One day an A&R scout calls them, says he's "been following them for a while now," and when their manager mentioned them to him, it just "clicked." Would they like to meet with him about the possibility of working out a deal with his label?

Wow. Big Break time. They meet the guy, and y'know what -- he's not what they expected from a label guy. He's young and dresses pretty much like the band does. He knows all their favorite bands. He's like one of them. He tells them he wants to go to bat for them, to try to get them everything they want. He says anything is possible with the right attitude.

They conclude the evening by taking home a copy of a deal memo they wrote out and signed on the spot. The A&R guy was full of great ideas, even talked about using a name producer. Butch Vig is out of the question — he wants 100 Gs and three points, but they can get Don Fleming for $30,000 plus three points. Even that's a little steep, so maybe they'll go with that guy who used to be in David Letterman's band. He only wants three points. Or they can have just anybody record it (like Warton Tiers, maybe-- cost you 5 or 7 grand) and have Andy Wallace remix it for 4 grand a track plus 2 points. It was a lot to think about.

Well, they like this guy and they trust him. Besides, they already signed the deal memo. He must have been serious about wanting them to sign. They break the news to their current label, and the label manager says he wants them to succeed, so they have his blessing. He will need to be compensated, of course, for the remaining albums left on their contract, but he'll work it out with the label himself.

Sub Pop made millions from selling off Nirvana, and Twin Tone hasn't done bad either: 50 grand for the Babes and 60 grand for the Poster Children -- without having to sell a single additional record. It'll be something modest. The new label doesn't mind, so long as it's recoupable out of royalties.

Well, they get the final contract, and it's not quite what they expected. They figure it's better to be safe than sorry and they turn it over to a lawyer--one who says he's experienced in entertainment law and he hammers out a few bugs.

They're still not sure about it, but the lawyer says he's seen a lot of contracts, and theirs is pretty good. They'll be great royalty: 13% [less a 10% packaging deduction]. Wasn't it Buffalo Tom that were only getting 12% less 10? Whatever.

The old label only wants 50 grand, and no points. Hell, Sub Pop got 3 points when they let Nirvana go. They're signed for four years, with options on each year, for a total of over a million dollars! That's a lot of money in any man's English. The first year's advance alone is $250,000. Just think about it, a quarter million, just for being in a rock band!


Their manager thinks it's a great deal, especially the large advance. Besides, he knows a publishing company that will take the band on if they get signed, and even give them an advance of 20 grand, so they'll be making that money too.

The manager says publishing is pretty mysterious, and nobody really knows where all the money comes from, but the lawyer can look that contract over, too. Hell, it's free money.

Their booking agent is excited about the band signing to a major. He says they can maybe average $1,000 or $2,000 a night from now on. That's enough to justify a five week tour, and with tour support, they can use a proper crew, buy some good equipment and even get a tour bus!

Buses are pretty expensive, but if you figure in the price of a hotel room for everybody In the band and crew, they're actually about the same cost. Some bands like Therapy? and Sloan and Stereolab use buses on their tours even when they're getting paid only a couple hundred bucks a night, and this tour should earn at least a grand or two every night. It'll be worth it. The band will be more comfortable and will play better.

The agent says a band on a major label can get a merchandising company to pay them an advance on T-shirt sales! ridiculous! There's a gold mine here! The lawyer should look over the merchandising contract, just to be safe.

They get drunk at the signing party. Polaroids are taken and everybody looks thrilled. The label picked them up in a limo.

They decided to go with the producer who used to be in Letterman's band.He had these technicians come in and tune the drums for them and tweak their amps and guitars. He had a guy bring in a slew of expensive old "vintage" microphones. Boy, were they "warm."

He even had a guy come in and check the phase of all the equipment in the control room! Boy, was he professional. He used a bunch of equipment on them and by the end of it, they all agreed that it sounded very "punchy," yet "warm."

All that hard work paid off. With the help of a video, the album went like hotcakes! They sold a quarter million copies!

Here is the math that will explain just how fucked they are: These figures are representative of amounts that appear in record contracts daily. There's no need to skew the figures to make the scenario look bad, since real-life examples more than abound. income is bold and underlined, expenses are not.

ADVANCE: $250,000



Manager's cut:

37,500

Legal fees:

10,000

Recording Budget:

150,000

Producer's advance:

50,000

Studio fee:

52,500

Drum Amp, Mic
& Phase "Doctors":

3,000

Recording tape:

8,000

Equipment rental:

5,000

Cartage & Transportation:

5,000

Lodgings while in studio:

10,000

Catering:

3,000

Mastering:

10,000

Tape copies, reference CDs, misc. expenses:

2,000

Video budget:

30,000

Cameras:

8,000

Crew:

5,000

Processing & transfers:

3,000

Off-line:

2,000

On-line editing:

3,000

Catering:

1,000

Stage & construction:

3,000

Copies, couriers, transportation:

2,000

Director's fee:

3,000

Album Artwork:

5,000

Promotional photo shoot
& duplication:

2,000

Band fund:

15,000

New fancy professional
drum kit:

5,000

New fancy professional guitars [2]:

3,000

New fancy professional guitar amp rigs [2]:

4,000

New fancy potato-shaped bass guitar:

1,000

New fancy rack of lights
bass amp:

1,000

Rehearsal space rental:

500

Big blowout party
for their friends:

500


Tour expense [5 weeks]:


50,875

Bus:

25,000

Crew [3]:

7,500

Food and per diems:

7,875

Fuel:

3,000

Consumable supplies:

3,500

Wardrobe:

1,000

Promotion:

3,000

Tour gross income:

50,000

Agent's cut:

7,500

Manager's cut:

7,500

Merchandising advance:

20,000

Manager's cut:

3,000

Lawyer's fee:

1,000

Publishing advance:

20,000

Manager's cut:

3,000

Lawyer's fee:

1,000

Record sales:

250,000
@ $12 =

$3,000,000

Gross retail
revenue Royalty:

[13% of 90%
of retail]:
351,000

Less advance:

250,000

Producer's points:

[3% less $50,000 advance]:
40,000

Promotional budget:

25,000

Recoupable buyout
from previous label:

50,000

Net royalty:

-14,000


Record company income:

Record wholesale price:

$6.50 x 250,000 =
$1,625,000 gross income

Artist Royalties:

351,000

Deficit from royalties:

14,000

Manufacturing, packaging
and distribution:

@ $2.20 per record: 550,000

Gross profit:

710,000




The Balance Sheet: This is how much
each player got paid at the end of the game.

Record company:

710,000

Producer:

90,000

Manager:

51,000

Studio:

52,500

Previous label:

50,000

Agent:

7,500

Lawyer:

12,000

Band- net income each:

$4,031.25





The band is now ¼th of the way through its contract, has made the music industry more than 3 million dollars richer, but is in the hole $14,000 on royalties.
The band members have each earned about one third as much as they would working at a 7-11, but they got to ride in a tour bus for a month.
The next album will be about the same, except that the record company will insist they spend more time and money on it. Since the previous one never "recouped," the band will have no leverage, and will oblige.
The next tour will be about the same, except the merchandising advance will have already been paid, and the band, strangely enough, won't have earned any royalties from their T-shirts yet. Maybe the T-shirt guys have figured out how to count money like record company guys. Some of your friends are probably already this fucked.