Showing posts with label the Voice of Experience. Show all posts
Showing posts with label the Voice of Experience. Show all posts

18.3.11

The Music Industry Loves Artists




"Look, my band - or GNR Inc - has had to do six audits of Geffen over the years because you know you sold this many records and they tell you you've only sold this many.

Why don't you just pay us for the f**king records?

Well, that's not how it works. They make it cost-prohibitive to sue.

The first time I became aware of it was 1994. There was a discrepancy of four million f**king records.

They were like "You can sue us, but it will cost you five million dollars and you might get half of that, so why don't we just settle for a quarter?" That's the way business is done. And we're on our sixth audit. That didn't just happen once.


Duff McKagan
bass player, Guns N' Roses



interview with Ben Rayner, Toronto Daily Star, 18/03/11






and the beat goes on.







.

22.1.11

Mulve - a musician's response





the 'piracy' issue often attracts lots of comments on sites around the web... far too much of which boils down to "oh yeah?", followed "yeah!", provoking yet another "oh yeah?", and so on ad infinitum...

here's one of the more intelligent responses i've come across, by a working musician...










Oct 09, 2010 at 05:37 by dg100

    Hi. I’m from a family of UK musicians. Some of you might be vaguely interested in how the “average” musician actually views all this and I have insomnia, so here’s another short novel. :)

    I’m basing this info on what I know of around 100 or so people’s views (mostly family and friends). Most of this isn’t from any formal polling or anything, just general recollection from the last few years of conversations.

    In case thinks this is the politics of envy, I should point out that – barring a few proper nutters convinced that rich people or the law can never be wrong – the consensus view of piracy is shared by almost everyone I know in the industry, including performing artists, studio professionals and a number of our music publishers’ own workers. This also includes some who have gained real money and fame from the current status quo.

    Piracy

    Very few musicians make any money worth the name from the studios, so it doesn’t make the slightest difference to most of us. So long as it’s not for profit, hardly anyone cares. On the other hand, we think pirates who do make money out of our work without paying us deserve to have their legs broken. Note the complete absence of a smiley at the end of that sentence.

    Most of us grew up copying tapes and have no problem with the idea. Most have no knowledge of bit-torrent, but those of us who are aware of it divide neatly into those who unquestioningly believe what the PRS, the newspapers, etc, have told them and those of us who use bit-torrent ourselves to keep up-to-date with the music scene.

    The division is (very roughly):
    60% don’t know and don’t care;
    30% think it’s a great idea;
    10% think the sky is falling.

    The few people I know who aren’t mental and do really object (about half a dozen in all) are all staunch right-wingers who resent piracy as a matter of moral principle, rather than because they believe it’s actually causing any financial harm.

    The studios and radio stations

    No-one thinks much of the studios, not even the people who work for them. Claims of studios being the cornerstone of music have no real basis in reality – it’s just PR puff. They’ve been saying the same things for years and it’s complete rubbish.

    The industry’s profits fill the pockets of it’s shareholders and of a few artists lucky and/or talented enough to reach the top and stay there. Everyone else gets shafted and everyone knows it.

    For all their self-promotion, their “investment” consists of loans made to artists which have to be paid back – and even then, it’s only if you fit the type they want to make money from – it’s very rare to find a label that has any interest in anything other than the latest formulaic tat.

    What they do want is the next-big-hit-that-sounds-exactly-like-the-last-big-hit and don’t care whether it’s any good or not. Support for whoever fits neatly into the most profitable niches (boybands, for example) is fantastic (if brief), but everyone else can sod off.

    It’s no accident that the top-rated radio-programmes in the UK are for “golden-oldies”. The studios learned a long time ago that they can and do make a lot of profit from talentless-but-marketable newcomers who can be given the worst deals and then instantly kicked to the curb when the novelty wears off.

    There’s much less profit to be had from talented performers who can become successful and then go on to make unreasonable demands, such as sleep or royalties or having some artistic input into their own music.

    It’s not a coincidence that the UK’s studios and industry bodies are so heavily in favour of a deliberately overpriced copyright-licensing regime that has forced vast numbers of live music venues to close their doors.

    All independent music, all talent is seen as a competitive threat.

    It’s only a matter of time before they look to stop public libraries from lending CDs, either by changing the law or going to download-only – and probably pay-per-play DRM’d downloads at that.

    They hope to make even more from piracy. If they can make it fly, they won’t even have to have any artists at all, they can just sell lawsuit-rights to the likes of ACS: Law, over and over, in perpetuity.

    No expenditure, just pure profit. The perfect publishing company for the people who own and run it. If they can do it, then they will do it. You just watch.

    Music

    The general consensus is that the studios and radio stations are mostly crap and have been killing music themselves for many decades, by swamping every outlet with over-hyped garbage aimed at increasingly undiscriminating audiences – that’s where the easiest, laziest money is, so that’s where they all go, to the detriment of any other consideration.

    What should be our country’s most thriving and diverse art-form is increasingly marginalised and irrelevant to everyone who isn’t fourteen years old. We don’t have a music scene, we have a small set of narrow, unchallenging music ghettos, all too often dominated by Britain’s least talented artists.

    There’s no consensus on what should be done to resolve music’s collective problems. But no-one I know with a trace of sanity thinks that stopping piracy has anything at all to do with it.

    Last word

    Regarding the post @118 by Anonymous:

    My family have been musicians for decades. Between us, we have over 150 years of experience, variously as studio- and independent-artists. I don’t think I’ve ever heard of any musician anywhere actually quitting because of piracy.

    Making music is a calling and a pleasure and a human need. You quit because of family commitments, because you need a regular full-time mortgage-paying job, because of health or because your heart’s just not in it any more. None of these things have been changed by file-sharing.

    As listener’s, we don’t buy CDs or official DLs because we can’t “steal” them, we buy them because we want to support the artist – that hasn’t changed since the invention of home audio tapes and it’s not changing now.

    Home taping did not kill music and bit-torrent is not killing music.
















pretty much covers the bases... one can only wish that thoughtful, experienced voices like this were more a part of the discussions, especially when it comes to creating legislation.

i wish i'd kept the link to this- if i can find it again, i'll post it...


and the beat goes on...





- 30 -






.

3.1.11

Speaking of Copyright...






Whenever a copyright law is to be made
or altered, then the idiots assemble.
     Mark Twain, 1902









Copyright law is totally out of date.  It is a Gutenberg artifact.  Since it is a reactive process,
it will probably have to break down completely before it is corrected.

     Nicholas Negroponte, 1995










In our day the conventional element in literature
is elaborately disguised by a law of copyright pretending that every work of art is an invention distinctive enough to be patented.
     Northrop Frye







The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA),
a gift to the well-financed entertainment and software industries, trashed the public interest.
It gave copyright owners the right to assert absolute control over copyrighted material, effectively allowing them to prevent the public from asserting a variety of traditional user's rights, including the ‘fair use' of making personal copies.

     Dan Gillmor, San Jose Mercury News






When I was recently asked to write a television script, the studio insisted that I sign four copies
of an affidavit giving it all rights to my writing ‘throughout the Universe in perpetuity.' 
I telephoned a studio lawyer to see if I could keep
a few moons of Jupiter. The lawyer became angry and pointed to the section of the affidavit in which
I recognized that the studio ‘becomes the Author of the Writer's Work. We mean it,' the lawyer said."

    Charles Mann, 1998









Stealing things is a glorious occupation,
particularly in the art world.

     Malcolm McLaren





27.12.10

Death of a Record Store



Here's another of the voices rarely heard when talking about music and downloading...

someone who used to run a record store.






In this case, it's a couple of guys who started a store in New York City in the 90s. They thought they if they worked hard, and made sure their staff could respond to both the average listener and the ones looking for something special, they had a shot. 


It had been a going concern through the 90s, but
their record store is gone now. Closed. Defunct.
Out of business.


What do these music lovers have to say about their experience and the cause of its demise?





"The sad thing is that CDs and downloads could have coexisted peacefully and profitably. The current state of affairs is largely the result of shortsightedness and boneheadedness by the major record labels and the Recording Industry Association of America, who managed to achieve the opposite of everything they wanted in trying to keep the music business prospering. The association is like a gardener who tried to rid his lawn of weeds and wound up killing the trees instead.

In the late ’90s, our business, and the music retail business in general, was booming. Enter Napster, the granddaddy of illegal download sites. How did the major record labels react? By continuing their campaign to eliminate the comparatively unprofitable CD single, raising list prices on album-length CDs to $18 or $19 and promoting artists like the Backstreet Boys and Britney Spears — whose strength was single songs, not albums. The result was a lot of unhappy customers, who blamed retailers like us for the dearth of singles and the high prices.

The recording industry association saw the threat that illegal downloads would pose to CD sales. But rather than working with Napster, it tried to sue the company out of existence — which was like thinking you’ve killed all the roaches in your apartment because you squashed the one you saw in the kitchen. More illegal download sites cropped up faster than the association’s lawyers could say “cease and desist.”








...read the rest of this ear-opening tale from 2007
at
the New York Times





- 30 -



.

26.12.10

the MPAA - how wrong can you be?

given both the vehemence and certainty or Mr. Valenti's assertions, and the enormous financial investment by the Motion Picture Association in lobbying governments to protect them from the evolution of communication technology over the years, a brief review of their concerns seems in order...



THE MPAA ON CABLE TELEVISION



"A huge parasite in the marketplace, feeding and fattening itself off of local television stations and copyright owners of copyrighted material."


alas, despite their best efforts, cable television's evil tentacles spread across North America...the result?



Turner Classic Movies TCM
Sundance Channel
Documentary Channel
Independent Film Channel IFC
Movieola
MovieTime
DUSK
Showcase Action
Showcase Diva
Silver Screen Classics
Encore Avenue 1
HBO Canada
HBO Canada HD
Movie Central 1, 2, 3
Movie Central HD 1
Super Channel 1, 2, 3, 4
Super Channel HD 1
Super Channel HD 2
The Movie Network
The Movie Network HD
Morepix
MExcess
MFest
Mpix

...in addition to the movies that are shown on traditional 'mixed" entertainment channels, these are the 24 dedicated movie channels available where i live (not counting adult movie channels and one that shows movies in Mandarin).

the Verdict?

WRONG!




THE MPAA ON VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS

"I say to you that the VCR is to the American film producer and the American public as the Boston Strangler is to the woman home alone".

"We are going to bleed and bleed and hemorrhage, unless this Congress..."

Despite Valenti's apocalyptic visions of blood,
the home video market ultimately came to be
the mainstay of movie studio revenues throughout the 1980s and into the 1990s, until the DVD.

At it's peak, the industry would sell about 70 million cassettes for rentals and 600 million cassettes for home viewing each year.

VCRs and their power pellets, the videotapes, did not destroy the movie industry. In reality, they probably saved it.


the Verdict?

WRONG!






THE MPAA ON INTERNET 'PIRACY'


Q: Can Internet piracy be contained?

A: It costs us $3.5 billion a year, but it's not going to go unchecked. We have the best brains working on this. I'm optimistic that in the next eight months to two years, we'll have this thing under control.

Jack Valenti, USA Today June 2004


well, as of 2010, they don't seem to have this one licked...so once again...

the Verdict?

WRONG!





THE MPAA ON INTERNET 'PIRACY' 2

“We’re fighting our own terrorist war
against people who would pirate movies online.




...clearly, the war on people 'pirating' continues- but based on the industry's attitude and tactics in the past, the odds are better than 50/50 that they might be



WRONG!

...again.


- 30 -






.

8.12.10

What Woody Guthrie said...




drawing of woody's guitar by Keith Carter






"This song is Copyrighted in U.S., under Seal
of Copyright #154085, for a period of 28 years,
and anybody caught singin' it without our permission, will be mighty good friends
of ourn, cause we don't give a dern.

Publish it. Write it. Sing it.
Swing to it. Yodel it.
We wrote it, that's all we wanted to do."





Written by Guthrie in the late 1930s
on a songbook distributed to listeners
of his L.A. radio show "Woody and Lefty Lou"
who wanted the words to his recordings.







- 30 -







.

16.11.10

Brian Eno on music, blubber & money











 

“I think records were just a little bubble through time and those who made a living from them
for a while were lucky.

There is no reason why anyone should have made so much money from selling records except that everything was right for this period of time. I always knew it would run out sooner or later. It couldn’t last, and now it’s running out. 

I don’t particularly care that it is and like the way things are going. The record age was just a blip.

It was a bit like if you had a source of whale blubber in the 1840s and it could be used as fuel. Before gas came along, if you traded in whale blubber, you were the richest man on Earth. Then gas came along and you’d be stuck with your whale blubber.

Sorry mate – history’s moving along.

Recorded music equals whale blubber. Eventually, something else will replace it.’’


Brian Eno









an oblique strategy









.

3.10.10

Mick Jagger on music piracy






   I am quite relaxed about it. But, you know,
it is a massive change and it does alter the fact that people don't make as much money out of records.

But I have a take on that - people only made money out of records for a very, very small time. When the Rolling Stones started out, we didn't make any money out of records because record companies wouldn't pay you! They didn't pay anyone!

Then, there was a small period from 1970 to 1997, where people did get paid, and they got paid very handsomely and everyone made money. But now that period has gone.

So if you look at the history of recorded music from 
1900 to now, there was a 25 year period where artists did very well, but the rest of the time they didn't.

from www.Billboard.biz


Sir Michael Philip "Mick" Jagger is an English musician, singer and songwriter best known as the lead vocalist of rock band, The Rolling Stones.

Prior to entering the music business, he studied at the London School of Economics. In 2010, his personal fortune was estimated at £190m.




-30-



.

27.5.10

An Audio Giant Exits the Stage

Fader pushers mourn Fritz Sennheiser • The Register

The founder of Sennheiser Electronics, Dr Fritz Sennheiser, has died aged 98.
Sennheiser studied electronics in Berlin in 1929 first at the Technical University then the Heinrich Hertz Institute. He helped build the amplification for the 1936 Berlin Olympics ceremony. During the war he worked in cryptography, but this was verboten by the Allies after VE Day.
He founded his company in the immediate aftermath of World War II. His first microphone was created for Siemens in 1949, and the company changed its name to Sennheiser Electronic in 1958. The company introduced the first open headphones, which are still in production today.
The name has been ubiquitious for studio engineers for 50 years, particularly for the specialist recording mics the 421 and 441.


read more at

http://www.sennheiser.com/sennheiser/home_en.nsf/root/press_releases_180510_biographie

26.8.09

Van Morrison about the Biz...









Sam Sutherland: At a time when the "record business," as it existed when you were forging your career, is crumbling and conventional wisdom forecasts the end of physical records and the decline of the album, what's your sense of the future? You've continued to sell albums despite those gloomy prophesies. And your catalog is built on albums that would appear to draw strength from strong thematic and musical pillars.

Well, that is a loaded question. The music business is not the music business. They do not care about music, never will. The days of [executives such as Atlantic Records co-founder] Ahmet Ertegun are gone and there is no one there to take his place. ... They try to brainwash people into digital. The younger kids are fine with downloads, but there is ... a world of people out there who know the value of a CD. It's the very best value for money entertainment there is.

The record companies are too lazy to manufacture CDs. That is their problem. And they have signed too many people who cannot sing and do not understand music in the least and this is the way record companies have caused their own demise.

To the young people: Be your own boss, be your own agent and be your own manager. This way you cannot lose. Oh, and be your own producer lest you fall for the fad of a big-shot producer who could change your song according to his vision, not yours. How could they possibly know what your intuitive vision is?



for more on from this interview, or more Van period,
check out: http://vanmorrisonnews.blogspot.com/2009/03/msn-interview-out-on-slipstream.html


-30-

11.6.09

The Problem with Music by Steve Albini (2)

this segment gets down to the real nitty-gritty...


There's this band...







They're pretty ordinary, but they're also pretty good, so they've attracted some attention. They're signed to a moderate-sized "independent" label owned by a distribution company, and they have another two albums owed to the label.

They're a little ambitious. They'd like to get signed by a major label so they can have some security: you know, get some good equipment, tour in a proper tour bus -- nothing fancy, just a little reward for all the hard work.

To that end, they got a manager. He knows some of the label guys, and he can shop their next project to all the right people. He takes his cut, sure, but it's only 15%, and if he can get them signed then it's money well spent. Anyways, it doesn't cost them anything if it doesn't work. 15% of nothing isn't much!

One day an A&R scout calls them, says he's "been following them for a while now," and when their manager mentioned them to him, it just "clicked." Would they like to meet with him about the possibility of working out a deal with his label?

Wow. Big Break time. They meet the guy, and y'know what -- he's not what they expected from a label guy. He's young and dresses pretty much like the band does. He knows all their favorite bands. He's like one of them. He tells them he wants to go to bat for them, to try to get them everything they want. He says anything is possible with the right attitude.

They conclude the evening by taking home a copy of a deal memo they wrote out and signed on the spot. The A&R guy was full of great ideas, even talked about using a name producer. Butch Vig is out of the question — he wants 100 Gs and three points, but they can get Don Fleming for $30,000 plus three points. Even that's a little steep, so maybe they'll go with that guy who used to be in David Letterman's band. He only wants three points. Or they can have just anybody record it (like Warton Tiers, maybe-- cost you 5 or 7 grand) and have Andy Wallace remix it for 4 grand a track plus 2 points. It was a lot to think about.

Well, they like this guy and they trust him. Besides, they already signed the deal memo. He must have been serious about wanting them to sign. They break the news to their current label, and the label manager says he wants them to succeed, so they have his blessing. He will need to be compensated, of course, for the remaining albums left on their contract, but he'll work it out with the label himself.

Sub Pop made millions from selling off Nirvana, and Twin Tone hasn't done bad either: 50 grand for the Babes and 60 grand for the Poster Children -- without having to sell a single additional record. It'll be something modest. The new label doesn't mind, so long as it's recoupable out of royalties.

Well, they get the final contract, and it's not quite what they expected. They figure it's better to be safe than sorry and they turn it over to a lawyer--one who says he's experienced in entertainment law and he hammers out a few bugs.

They're still not sure about it, but the lawyer says he's seen a lot of contracts, and theirs is pretty good. They'll be great royalty: 13% [less a 10% packaging deduction]. Wasn't it Buffalo Tom that were only getting 12% less 10? Whatever.

The old label only wants 50 grand, and no points. Hell, Sub Pop got 3 points when they let Nirvana go. They're signed for four years, with options on each year, for a total of over a million dollars! That's a lot of money in any man's English. The first year's advance alone is $250,000. Just think about it, a quarter million, just for being in a rock band!


Their manager thinks it's a great deal, especially the large advance. Besides, he knows a publishing company that will take the band on if they get signed, and even give them an advance of 20 grand, so they'll be making that money too.

The manager says publishing is pretty mysterious, and nobody really knows where all the money comes from, but the lawyer can look that contract over, too. Hell, it's free money.

Their booking agent is excited about the band signing to a major. He says they can maybe average $1,000 or $2,000 a night from now on. That's enough to justify a five week tour, and with tour support, they can use a proper crew, buy some good equipment and even get a tour bus!

Buses are pretty expensive, but if you figure in the price of a hotel room for everybody In the band and crew, they're actually about the same cost. Some bands like Therapy? and Sloan and Stereolab use buses on their tours even when they're getting paid only a couple hundred bucks a night, and this tour should earn at least a grand or two every night. It'll be worth it. The band will be more comfortable and will play better.

The agent says a band on a major label can get a merchandising company to pay them an advance on T-shirt sales! ridiculous! There's a gold mine here! The lawyer should look over the merchandising contract, just to be safe.

They get drunk at the signing party. Polaroids are taken and everybody looks thrilled. The label picked them up in a limo.

They decided to go with the producer who used to be in Letterman's band.He had these technicians come in and tune the drums for them and tweak their amps and guitars. He had a guy bring in a slew of expensive old "vintage" microphones. Boy, were they "warm."

He even had a guy come in and check the phase of all the equipment in the control room! Boy, was he professional. He used a bunch of equipment on them and by the end of it, they all agreed that it sounded very "punchy," yet "warm."

All that hard work paid off. With the help of a video, the album went like hotcakes! They sold a quarter million copies!

Here is the math that will explain just how fucked they are: These figures are representative of amounts that appear in record contracts daily. There's no need to skew the figures to make the scenario look bad, since real-life examples more than abound. income is bold and underlined, expenses are not.

ADVANCE: $250,000



Manager's cut:

37,500

Legal fees:

10,000

Recording Budget:

150,000

Producer's advance:

50,000

Studio fee:

52,500

Drum Amp, Mic
& Phase "Doctors":

3,000

Recording tape:

8,000

Equipment rental:

5,000

Cartage & Transportation:

5,000

Lodgings while in studio:

10,000

Catering:

3,000

Mastering:

10,000

Tape copies, reference CDs, misc. expenses:

2,000

Video budget:

30,000

Cameras:

8,000

Crew:

5,000

Processing & transfers:

3,000

Off-line:

2,000

On-line editing:

3,000

Catering:

1,000

Stage & construction:

3,000

Copies, couriers, transportation:

2,000

Director's fee:

3,000

Album Artwork:

5,000

Promotional photo shoot
& duplication:

2,000

Band fund:

15,000

New fancy professional
drum kit:

5,000

New fancy professional guitars [2]:

3,000

New fancy professional guitar amp rigs [2]:

4,000

New fancy potato-shaped bass guitar:

1,000

New fancy rack of lights
bass amp:

1,000

Rehearsal space rental:

500

Big blowout party
for their friends:

500


Tour expense [5 weeks]:


50,875

Bus:

25,000

Crew [3]:

7,500

Food and per diems:

7,875

Fuel:

3,000

Consumable supplies:

3,500

Wardrobe:

1,000

Promotion:

3,000

Tour gross income:

50,000

Agent's cut:

7,500

Manager's cut:

7,500

Merchandising advance:

20,000

Manager's cut:

3,000

Lawyer's fee:

1,000

Publishing advance:

20,000

Manager's cut:

3,000

Lawyer's fee:

1,000

Record sales:

250,000
@ $12 =

$3,000,000

Gross retail
revenue Royalty:

[13% of 90%
of retail]:
351,000

Less advance:

250,000

Producer's points:

[3% less $50,000 advance]:
40,000

Promotional budget:

25,000

Recoupable buyout
from previous label:

50,000

Net royalty:

-14,000


Record company income:

Record wholesale price:

$6.50 x 250,000 =
$1,625,000 gross income

Artist Royalties:

351,000

Deficit from royalties:

14,000

Manufacturing, packaging
and distribution:

@ $2.20 per record: 550,000

Gross profit:

710,000




The Balance Sheet: This is how much
each player got paid at the end of the game.

Record company:

710,000

Producer:

90,000

Manager:

51,000

Studio:

52,500

Previous label:

50,000

Agent:

7,500

Lawyer:

12,000

Band- net income each:

$4,031.25





The band is now ¼th of the way through its contract, has made the music industry more than 3 million dollars richer, but is in the hole $14,000 on royalties.
The band members have each earned about one third as much as they would working at a 7-11, but they got to ride in a tour bus for a month.
The next album will be about the same, except that the record company will insist they spend more time and money on it. Since the previous one never "recouped," the band will have no leverage, and will oblige.
The next tour will be about the same, except the merchandising advance will have already been paid, and the band, strangely enough, won't have earned any royalties from their T-shirts yet. Maybe the T-shirt guys have figured out how to count money like record company guys. Some of your friends are probably already this fucked.